CaRLC News Release
01/14/2000 Immediate
Contact: William Westmiller
CaRLC Proposition Endorsements
REPUBLICANS SUPPORT ONLY TWO PROPS
The Republican Liberty Caucus has endorsed two propositions that will appear on
the March 2000 primary ballot, but aren't impressed with any of the others. The
activist libertarians in the Republican Party favor Prop 17, which would
legalize charitable lotteries, and Prop 28, which would repeal the state tobacco
tax.
The RLC favors the elimination of restrictions on any gambling activities which
are free of fraud and misrepresentation, but believes that sanctioned monopolies
on gambling ought to be avoided. While supporting the common non-profit
fundraising proposed in Prop 17, the group took no position no Prop 1-A, which
would grant Indian tribes exclusive rights to offer certain gaming
opportunities. Restricting the right to offer or participate in games of chance
solely on the basis of race is a form of reverse discrimination which ought to
be opposed, but any small step toward more freedom should be encouraged. These
conflicting considerations led the new Republican
group to withhold endorsement of the Indian Gaming proposition.
Eliminating the use of tax penalties for social objectives is just one facet of
Republican opposition to excessive, fruitless and penury taxation that burdens
every Californian. The cigarette tax is not just a huge burden on lower income
residents, it is a tax based on feeble science, flawed sociology and bad
government principles. Proceeds
from the tax support a propaganda effort which is short on facts and which
enriches a few politically-connected advocacy groups. Responsibility for the ill
consequences of
risky behavior should be borne by those who chose to take risks, in spite of
well-known and disclosed hazards.
All Californians should
think twice about the usual assortment of bond issues on every ballot. Contrary
to common assumption, bonds are not free money for good
purposes and the Republican Liberty Caucus opposes all the propositions that
would commit Californians to long-term tax and interest expenditures. Worthy
programs ought to be incorporated into state capital budget priorities rather
than
foisted off on the next generation with a decade of heavy interest. Bonds
attempt to hide and entrench the tax burden that will be suffered most by those
citizens who cannot benefit from the tax-exempt investment income granted to the
wealthy buyers of state debt issues.
- End -
William Westmiller
CaRLC Chair
44 Summerfield Street
Thousand Oaks, CA 91360
westmiller@aol.com
(805) 493-4332 hm
(805) 373-0596 wk
|
CaRLC Ballot Positions |
||
| Prop 1-A | Indian Gaming | No Position |
| Prop 12 | Bond | No |
| Prop 13 | Bond | No |
| Prop 14 | Bond | No |
| Prop 15 | Bond | No |
| Prop 16 | Bond | No |
| Prop 17 | Charitable Lotteries | Yes |
| Prop 18 | Murder Circumstances | No Position |
| Prop 19 | Peace Officers Penalty | No Position |
| Prop 20 | Textbook Lottery | No |
| Prop 21 | Juvenile Crime | No |
| Prop 22 | Limits On Marriage | No |
| Prop 23 | None Of The Above | No Position |
| Prop 24 | Let The Voters Decide | Removed from Ballot |
| Prop 25 | Campaign Finance | No |
| Prop 26 | 2/3 Bond Requirement | No |
| Prop 27 | Congressional Term Limits | No |
| Prop 28 | Tobacco Tax Repeal | Yes |
| Prop 29 | Gaming Compacts | No* |
| Prop 30 | Insurance Reform | No* |
| Prop 31 | Insurance Reform | No* |
|
* Late Propositions added to the ballot: Pending Positions |
||